An evil genius's guide to Digital ID

Published: Fri, 11/14/25

The most disturbing thing about the Covid experience of 2020 onwards which I observed was the degree of coercion that was attempted by the authorities and supported by far to many people. As a self-employed handyman I found that most of my regular clients were very happy to come to their homes and do work for the. Often it was a welcome break from the monotony of isolation which the authorities were imposing by closing schools, churches, cinemas, pubs, and even trying to keep people out of parks and public areas.
The situation became worse when the jabs were rolled out a year later. I had made it clear that I didn’t do masks or jabs and if that was a problem for any of my clients, then find another handyman, I think I might have lost a couple of jobs but it didn’t really matter. The people I felt sorry for were those who really didn’t want to be jabbed but worked for the NHS and were told that they would not be allowed to do their jobs if they did not comply. About 10 percent of care workers left their jobs when a job or jab choice was imposed on that sector. The same was supposed to happen in the NHS until it was realised that explaining why 1 in 10 medical professionals would rather leave their careers than accept the ‘safe and effective’ injections was going to be a bit awkward.
Some friends of mine provide a foster home children who have been removed from abusive and neglectful parents. They were told by the agency they work through that if they were not jabbed then the children who had been in their long term care would be removed to more compliant homes. The foster mother in particular has suffered from health complications which are attributable to the MRNA injections. In the USA it became a requirement that to become a naturalised US citizen you had to have had the jabs. This requirement was only ended last year.
It should be clear from the examples listed above, that those who created and directed Covid were willing to use any leverage they could find to get people to roll up their sleeves for the needle as many times as possible. You will know of examples of this coercion that might have been applied to you, or to people you know.
Fortunately for many people there was a limit to the pressure that could be applied. Some people complied in order to keep their jobs, but there was always the option of just resigning and finding another occupation, at least temporarily.
Now lets look a few years ahead. The current occupant of number 10 Downing Street (our Prime Minister) is desperate to introduce Digital I D, without which, he says, you will not be able to legally work. Apparently this will succeed in preventing illegal immigration where the combined forces of the police, passport control, customs officers, the Border force, the crown prosecution service , the coastguard, and the Royal Navy etc have failed. Oh, well, good to know that there is a simple solution to such an intractable problem.
No on else needs to worry about this system, since if you are not an illegal immigrant then Digital ID won’t affect you. Or might it? Digital ID will only make any sense if it identifies you in every aspect of your life. Apart from permission to work, your tax status, your right to access the NHS, along with your medical records, and your compliance with ‘online safety’, (meaning access to the internet), how about the following? Access to your bank accounts (and will cash still be available?). Perhaps your car, motorcycle, or even your electric bicycle will be programmed to recognise your Digital ID, to discourage theft of course. What about access to education? At what age will a child have to have Digital ID to attend school, let alone college or university? Access to benefits such as Universal Credit, of even the State Pension? These will certainly be tied to Digital ID. So, if your Digital ID is suspended or cancelled for
lack of compliance life could be a bit difficult.
Some will argue that Digital ID a good idea if it reduces crime and fraud and gets illegal immigration under control.
Firstly, law and order requires the enforcement and judicial system to actually do their job. A crime can be reported to the police with a name and address of the perpetrator, evidence may be available, and witnesses willing to testify and still the CPS will refuse to prosecute. In fact the powers that be may well want as much crime and disorder as possible to justify draconian implementation of Digital ID. Or maybe the authorities are just so incompetent that even Digital ID won’t make any difference. The reality will be a bit of both.
Secondly, you might hope that a UK government would never use Digital ID in a repressive way. Well, the Prime Minister has already told us that he intends to use Digital ID to control who works and who doesn’t which sounds pretty draconian to me. Can’t we vote at the next election for a more liberal government? Apart from the Uni party problem meaning that whoever you vote for you always get a government which is pretty much the same as the last one, who do you think is actually going to provide Digital ID? Which brings me to:
Thirdly, what is the real reason for Big Tech wanting to build their massive and energy hungry data centres? There is no such thing as AI and their never will be, the programmes we actually need run perfectly well on the computers we have available right now. The data centres are for enmeshing the world population in a corporate Digital ID system.
No government can possibly create and run a full Digital ID system (except possibly the Chinese and I have seen reports that even the CCP has worked with international partners to create their system of ‘social credit’). So, Digital ID services will be provided by trans national corporations such as Palantir and Microsoft and how this service is actually provided will be way beyond the control of individual governments. Bill Gates, who is very keen on Digital ID, and whose company stands to make massive profits, is also keen on population reduction, and is heavily invested in the pharmaceutical companies which made so much money out of Covid. What could possibly go wrong? I will let you join the dots yourself while considering where informed medical consent fits into this picture.
Fourthly, even if a Digital ID system works perfectly and those who manage it in no way abuse their position, what happens if a solar flare, or similar situation, disrupts the internet? Life will just stop until the system is rebooted, assuming the infrastructure can be repaired.
This weekend I am attending a Together conference in London. One of the topics discussed will be Digital ID, the dangers it presents and what might be done about it. I will report back next week.
regards
Graham
PS We have a new date for a Salisbury course, the 21st of March 2026 and the link is here https://iceandfire.org.uk/salisbury210326.html
PPS Stavcamp 2026 should be confirmed soon, probably the first weekend of September

Graham Butcher
21 Beaver Road
Beverley East Yorkshire HU17 0QN
UNITED KINGDOM

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options, visit:
https://www.aweber.com/z/r/?ThisIsATestEmail